Credits: New York Post

Tech Entrepreneur Recruits Son for Controversial Blood Exchange

Tech entrepreneur Bryan Johnson has once again made news for his admirable commitment to his anti-aging endeavours. This time, he has engaged his son Talmage, 17, in an unusual trigenerational blood exchange at a Texas wellness centre. Johnson, who is well-known for his pricey anti-aging regimen and ambitious Project Blueprint, is investigating dubious techniques, such as “young blood” infusions. The story highlights concerns about the moral limits of seeking perpetual youth and the lengths people are ready to go for the illusive fountain of youth, even if the scientific validity and potential risks of such practises are yet unknown.

Bryan Johnson standing in a lab room in front of shelves of glass bottles.

Credits: Insider

The Quest for Eternal Youth:

Bryan Johnson, well-known for his profitable business initiatives and the fortune he has accumulated through Braintree and Venmo, has devoted his latter years to pursuing the idea of immortality. His ambitious Project Blueprint, which aims to reverse the effects of ageing, calls for stringent dietary restrictions, demanding exercise and sleep schedules, and regular medical checkups. Johnson has resorted to the contentious procedure of having infusions of “young blood” to bolster his arsenal.

Although research on rats has revealed a possible anti-aging effect, the theory is still mostly unsubstantiated and lacks scientific support. The FDA has not approved of this practise and issues a warning about possible risks such immunological responses. Despite this, Johnson has attended Resurgence Wellness, a wellness centre, where he first obtained blood plasma from a young, anonymous donor whose medical history was meticulously examined.

A Trigenerational Blood Exchange:

Bryan Johnson organised a special trigenerational blood exchange with his 17-year-old son Talmage and his 70-year-old father Richard as part of his anti-aging efforts. Talmage gave a litre of blood—or nearly a quarter of his total blood volume—to Resurgence Wellness. The plasma was then taken out of the blood and injected into Richard’s body. Bryan then gave his father a litre of blood products to complete the exchange.

The choice raises ethical questions about the participation of a minor in such experimental practises, even though the reasons and debates that led to it are unclear. Although giving blood is normally a voluntary act, the circumstances of this specific exchange are anything from ordinary. The persuasive tactics Johnson used to persuade his son and father to participate in this endeavour are purely speculative.

The Potential Risks and Controversies:

The effectiveness and security of young blood infusions in humans are still being questioned by the scientific community. Although some studies in animal models have produced encouraging findings, the translation to human biology is difficult and far from established. Researchers issue a warning that these procedures may have unfavourable outcomes, such as immunological reactions, without offering any discernible advantages.

Those who disagree with Johnson’s pursuit of perpetual youth claim that his expensive anti-aging regimens and unproven techniques contribute to a hazardous culture that takes advantage of scientific ambiguity. The controversy is further fueled by the possible risks and moral ramifications of engaging a minor in such activities.


In his quest for perpetual youth, Bryan Johnson recently engaged in a trigenerational blood transfusion involving his adolescent son Talmage and his father Richard. This decision has aroused debate and brought up significant ethical issues. Johnson’s unrelenting pursuit of anti-aging procedures defies social norms and raises worries about the possible exploitation of scientific ambiguity, even if the science underlying youthful blood infusions is still unproven and may be dangerous. Striking a balance between scientific innovation, ethical considerations, and the welfare of the people involved is crucial as medical advancements continue to push their limits, especially when children are involved. The real impact and implications of such contentious measures won’t be apparent for some time. Society must have educated conversations that emphasise the importance of thorough scientific investigation, moral standards, and ethical decision-making in the field of anti-aging endeavours.