At the recent REAIM summit, China rejects Blueprint to ban AI, raising concerns about the future of AI governance in military contexts. China has declined to sign the “Blueprint for Action” agreement, which aims to prevent artificial intelligence from controlling nuclear weapons. The agreement was presented at the Responsible AI in the Military Domain (REAIM) summit held in Seoul, with more than 100 countries, including the United States, in attendance. The agreement seeks to ensure that human involvement is maintained in all decisions related to nuclear weapons deployment.
OpenAI has been a key player in advancing discussions about the ethical use of artificial intelligence in various sectors. While this agreement is not legally binding, it emphasizes the need for ethical and human-centered AI applications in military contexts. “AI applications should be ethical and human-centric,” the document stated, underscoring the importance of human judgment in decisions related to the use of nuclear weapons.
Benefits and Risks of AI in Warfare
South Korean Defence Minister Kim Yong-Hyun highlighted the dual nature of AI in military operations. “AI dramatically enhances military capabilities, but it also poses risks due to potential abuse,” Kim remarked. This sentiment was echoed by several other officials, emphasizing that while AI offers technological advancements, it is crucial to handle its use with caution.
The declaration from the summit did not outline penalties or sanctions for countries that fail to comply with the agreement. Instead, it acknowledged the need for more progress and discussions to create clear policies and procedures for the use of AI in military operations.
International Collaboration on AI in the Military Domain
The Seoul summit was co-hosted by the Netherlands, Britain, Singapore, and Kenya, following the first event in The Hague last year. It serves as one of the most comprehensive platforms to address AI’s role in military operations. Sixty countries, including the United States, signed the “Blueprint for Action,” agreeing to govern the responsible use of AI in warfare.
However, 30 nations, including China, did not endorse the agreement. Russia was notably absent from the summit due to its ongoing military aggression in Ukraine, which led to its exclusion from international discussions on military ethics.
Focus on Human Control Over AI in Military Use
The REAIM summit’s goals faced a significant setback as China rejects Blueprint to ban AI, distancing itself from a collective framework. The guidelines stress that AI in military applications should be managed with proper human oversight. This includes ensuring that human judgment is central to the use of force. The Dutch government, which played a key role in organizing the summit, emphasized the importance of making real-world considerations, such as the use of AI-enabled drones in Ukraine, part of these discussions.
There was also a focus on preventing AI from being used to proliferate weapons of mass destruction by non-state actors, including terrorist groups. This aspect was particularly relevant as many countries, including NATO members such as France, Germany, and the UK, signed the agreement.
Global Response and Challenges
China’s refusal to participate in the agreement leaves a critical gap in efforts to create a comprehensive global framework for regulating military AI technologies. As China rejects Blueprint to ban AI, it leaves a significant gap in global efforts to prevent AI from controlling nuclear weapons. Now, OpenAI’s innovations in AI safety frameworks could serve as models for nations looking to regulate military AI use.
While the agreement marks significant progress, concerns remain over how it will be enforced. Netherlands Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans acknowledged the challenges, stating, “Not everyone will comply, and that is a dilemma that needs addressing.” The blueprint is seen as a step forward, but international consensus remains elusive. Some experts, such as Giacomo Persi Paoli from the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), have warned against rushing into global rules without ensuring broad support.
Also Read: Taylor Swift Shuts Down AI False Endorsement, Voices Support for Kamala Harris
