Many experts are noting that 57% of young applicants are using ChatGPT for job resumes to improve their chances of landing interviews. As job markets tighten, many candidates are turning to generative AI tools like ChatGPT to enhance their applications. However, this trend may be causing more harm than good, as recruiters face an influx of low-quality, machine-written submissions.
Recent surveys, including those cited by the Financial Times, indicate that nearly half of all job applicants now rely on AI writing tools for some part of their application process. This surge in AI-generated content is overwhelming recruiters who are already grappling with a high volume of applications across various industries.
“We’re seeing more applications, but the quality has declined,” said Khyati Sundaram, CEO of recruitment platform Applied. She explained that the ease of copy-pasting content from tools like ChatGPT makes it harder for recruiters to identify strong candidates.
Impact on Recruiters and Hiring Processes
According to recent data, 57% of young applicants are using ChatGPT for job resumes to streamline their application process. A competitive job market and easy access to online job boards have contributed to a significant increase in application volumes due to AI-generated resumes. Even before AI became a factor, recruiters were already struggling to manage the high volume of applications. Now, the situation has worsened.
Today, recruiters are faced with resumes and cover letters that often appear generic and are filled with keywords. These submissions are often written in a style that is distinctly AI-generated, making them less appealing to hiring managers. Andy Heyes, from tech recruitment firm Harvey Nash, noted that “bland” applications with “American grammar” are frequently flagged as potential AI outputs.
Employers Respond to AI-Generated Content
Recruiters are seeing a rise in AI-generated content, as 57% of young applicants are using ChatGPT for job resumes. Many large employers have implemented strict policies against the use of AI in job applications. The Big Four accounting firms—Deloitte, EY, PwC, and KPMG—have warned applicants against using AI tools in their submissions. Despite these efforts, the battle against AI-generated content is challenging.
A survey by Neurosight revealed that 57% of student job seekers use ChatGPT for their applications. Those who opt for the paid premium version, which produces more refined and human-like text, tend to fare better in hiring processes compared to those using the free version. Jamie Betts, founder of Neurosight, noted that students from higher socio-economic backgrounds, typically male and non-disabled, are more likely to invest in these premium AI tools.
To counter the rise of AI-generated content, many recruiters are relying on traditional methods like personal interviews. While an AI-generated resume may get through initial screenings, recruiters believe the authenticity of a candidate’s experience will be revealed during face-to-face or virtual interviews.
Interestingly, despite the surge in AI usage by job seekers, many candidates express reluctance to work for companies that use AI in their hiring processes. A study last year found that 66% of Americans would avoid applying to companies that use AI for recruitment.
Benefits v. Challenges
On the surface, AI tools can seem like a game-changer for job seekers. They can help craft well-organized resumes, suggest industry-relevant keywords, and even boost a candidate’s confidence during interviews. These tools are particularly useful for those who might struggle with writing or lack experience in creating professional job applications.
However, the reality of AI’s impact on the hiring process is far more complex. As more candidates turn to AI-generated content, recruiters are faced with an overwhelming volume of applications that often lack originality and personal touch.
Moreover, those who can afford premium AI services, which produce more sophisticated and human-like content, may gain an unfair advantage over others. This raises ethical concerns about equal opportunity in the job market. Additionally, the reliance on AI-generated content can mask a candidate’s true abilities.
