• Send Us A Tip
  • Calling all Tech Writers
  • Advertise
Friday, October 9, 2026
  • Login
TechStory
  • News
  • Crypto
  • Gadgets
  • Memes
  • Gaming
  • Cars
  • AI
  • Startups
  • Markets
  • How to
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Crypto
  • Gadgets
  • Memes
  • Gaming
  • Cars
  • AI
  • Startups
  • Markets
  • How to
No Result
View All Result
TechStory
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

BharatPe Backs New UPI MDR Framework, Distances Itself From Ashneer Grover’s Criticism

by Ishaan Negi
September 18, 2026
in Business, Markets, News, Tech, Trending, World
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
BharatPe Backs New UPI MDR Framework, Distances Itself From Ashneer Grover’s Criticism

Credits: Hindustan Times

TwitterWhatsappLinkedin

India’s digital payments ecosystem is entering a new phase as the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) introduces a revised Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) framework for certain UPI transactions. While BharatPe has welcomed the changes, its former CEO and co-founder Ashneer Grover has criticised the move, arguing that the cost could eventually reach consumers.

You might also like

How Businesses Use Mobile Proxy Servers for Localized Data Collection

Navi Eyes $40 Mn Funding as IPO Plans Take Shape

Ola Electric Eyes ₹1,000 Cr Rights Issue at 26% Discount

The contrasting views have also prompted BharatPe to publicly clarify that Grover’s comments do not represent the company’s position.

BharatPe backs UPI MDR framework, distances itself from Ashneer Grover's  remarks

Credits: Fact Net

BharatPe Says New MDR Framework Will Strengthen UPI Ecosystem

BharatPe has backed the new MDR framework, describing it as an important step towards creating a stronger and more sustainable digital payments ecosystem.

Nalin Negi, CEO of BharatPe, said the framework would allow UPI to remain free for consumers while creating a more sustainable structure for payments infrastructure. According to Negi, consumers will continue to pay no charges for UPI transactions, while micro and small merchants covered under the person-to-person merchant (P2PM) framework will remain protected through Zero MDR.

“The new MDR framework proves that UPI will remain free for consumers while building a sustainable, robust and stronger payments ecosystem,” Negi said, according to news agency ANI.

The company believes the revised structure could help support the expansion of merchant acceptance and digital payment infrastructure, particularly in smaller cities and underserved markets.

Citing NPCI data, Negi said around 96% of person-to-merchant (P2M) transactions will remain unaffected under the new framework. He added that the approach would create resources to expand payment acceptance and digital infrastructure without placing additional pressure on micro and small merchants.

For BharatPe, which has built its business around serving India’s small merchants, the protection of this segment remains central to its position.

“BharatPe has always been a champion of the small merchant, and we strongly support this approach that protects them while strengthening the ecosystem they depend on,” Negi said.

BharatPe Distances Itself From Ashneer Grover’s Remarks

While BharatPe has supported the MDR changes, Grover has taken a sharply different view of the framework.

The former BharatPe CEO has criticised the introduction of merchant charges on certain UPI transactions above ₹2,000 and questioned whether businesses will ultimately absorb the additional cost.

BharatPe has now made it clear that Grover’s comments should not be interpreted as the company’s position.

A company spokesperson said Grover has had no association with BharatPe since 2024 and is neither a shareholder nor associated with the company in any capacity.

“Mr. Grover has had no association with BharatPe since 2024 and is neither a shareholder nor associated with the company in any capacity,” the spokesperson said.

The company also urged media organisations not to attribute Grover’s views to BharatPe.

The clarification is significant because Grover remains closely associated with BharatPe in the public conversation, having co-founded the fintech company and served as its CEO. However, the company has emphasised that its current position is represented by its present leadership and authorised spokespersons.

What Ashneer Grover Said About UPI Charges

Grover has argued that the debate around MDR should focus on who ultimately bears the cost.

In a television interview with Times Now, he questioned the distinction between a charge and a tax, particularly if the additional cost eventually gets passed on to customers.

When asked about the argument that only consumers who can afford the additional fee would be affected, Grover challenged the premise.

“Then call it tax. Why are you calling it a ‘charge’, ‘MDR’, or claiming that it won’t affect the customer?” Grover said.

His comments highlight a broader concern surrounding the economics of India’s UPI ecosystem: while consumers have become accustomed to making digital payments without direct transaction charges, payment infrastructure still carries costs for banks, payment platforms and merchants.

The new MDR framework is therefore aimed at addressing the sustainability of the ecosystem while maintaining zero charges for consumers under the stated framework.

BharatPe Supports New UPI MDR Regime, Draws Clear Line from Ashneer Grover's  Remarks

Credits: Free Press Journal

For merchants, however, the impact depends on the transaction category and the applicable MDR structure. BharatPe’s position is that the majority of P2M transactions will remain unaffected and that protections for smaller merchants will continue.

The disagreement between BharatPe and its former CEO ultimately reflects two different perspectives on the same policy shift. BharatPe is focusing on the long-term sustainability of India’s digital payments infrastructure, while Grover has raised questions about whether transaction costs could eventually find their way to consumers.

As UPI continues to expand across India, the balance between keeping payments accessible, protecting small merchants and ensuring a financially sustainable ecosystem will remain central to the MDR debate.

Tags: Ashneer GroverBharatPeBharatPe CEODigital Paymentsfintech IndiaMerchant Discount RateNPCIUPI chargesUPI MDRUPI transactions
Tweet55SendShare15
Previous Post

Why Fragmented Financial Markets Are Giving Way to Unified Access, and Where CGM NEO Fits In

Next Post

New York Times vs OpenAI: Unsealed Filing Reveals Scale of AI Content Collection

Ishaan Negi

Ishaan is a student at Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, where he combines his academic pursuits with a deep passion for technology and storytelling. Ever since his school days, Ishaan has been an avid reader, a thoughtful writer, and an articulate speaker. These interests have naturally evolved into a strong inclination towards journalism, especially in the fast-paced world of tech. Known for his balanced approach, Ishaan is committed to presenting unbiased viewpoints and ensuring every story he tells is rooted in facts and multiple perspectives. Whether he’s reporting on emerging startups, corporate developments, or ethical issues in the tech space, he brings a sharp analytical lens and a curiosity-driven mindset to his work. With a strong foundation in research and communication, Ishaan strives to make complex topics accessible to readers while maintaining depth and nuance. His goal is not just to inform but also to spark thoughtful conversations around the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Recommended For You

How Businesses Use Mobile Proxy Servers for Localized Data Collection

by Rohan Mathawan
October 9, 2026
0
Engineering teams building market intelligence pipelines frequently deal with rate limits and manipulated pricing data. Target platforms actively manage incoming traffic using security tools like Web Application Firewalls and TLS fingerprinting. Relying on commercial server nodes for data extraction often leads to interrupted sessions. To solve this, businesses are moving their infrastructure toward authentic cellular networks. Using mobile proxy servers allows them to collect accurate, localized web data reliably. TL;DR: Core benefits of mobile proxy servers for data extraction Carrier-grade trust: Mobile networks use CGNAT, masking your automated traffic alongside thousands of real smartphone users, resulting in maximum IP trust scores. Organic IP shifts: Security systems are adapted to mobile networks where IP addresses routinely change across local cell towers. A dynamic IP is completely natural, provided your geographic region and device footprint remain consistent. Dedicated vs. shared hardware: Dedicated modems allow manual IP rotation via API but require a 5 to 10-second pause while the physical hardware reboots. Shared proxies offer fixed-interval rotation without interrupting active users. Maintaining stable access: Premium infrastructures use the VLESS protocol to route proxy connections as standard HTTPS browsing. This helps maintain connections in environments with strict local ISP filtering. Why localized data extraction requires authentic connections Companies extract localized web data to see information exactly as it appears to a regular user in a specific region. Pricing and availability change based on the viewer's location. A consumer searching a travel aggregator from London sees different flight options than a user querying the exact same route from Tokyo. Teams historically built scraping infrastructure on data center IPs. Today, anti-fraud engines maintain strict databases of commercial cloud subnets. When a firewall detects consumer-level requests coming from a corporate server, it ruins the connection's trust score. Real users do not browse from cloud data centers. The target platform simply responds with CAPTCHAs or HTTP 429 errors. How mobile proxy servers maintain stable access To ensure stable data collection, automated traffic needs to match the normal network patterns of genuine human users. Mobile proxy servers accomplish this by routing requests through real 4G LTE or 5G modems equipped with authentic SIM cards. This works through Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT). Mobile carriers do not assign a unique public IP to every smartphone. Instead, they push the data streams of thousands of subscribers onto the internet through a single shared IP address. Banning a CGNAT mobile IP means disconnecting hundreds of real retail consumers in that area. To avoid this collateral damage, security engines treat mobile carrier ASNs with extreme leniency, granting them trust scores between 90% and 99%. Infrastructure Type Network Source CGNAT Shielding Average Trust Score Algorithmic WAF Reaction Data Center Commercial Cloud Providers No (1:1 routing) 20% - 40% Immediate block, CAPTCHA, or rate-limit for consumer endpoints. Static Residential Home Internet Providers Rare (Usually 1:1) 70% - 85% Reliable for steady sessions, but flagged during abrupt traffic spikes. Mobile (LTE/5G) Real Cellular Carrier Networks Yes (Thousands to 1) 90% - 99% High tolerance; blocking is mathematically prohibitive due to collateral damage. IP rotation: Why dynamic addresses are natural for mobile proxy servers Many operators believe that keeping a static, unchanging IP address is the only way to maintain a healthy session. They assume an IP rotation during a collection task immediately triggers security algorithms. In reality, the internet is heavily adapted to a mobile-first world. When genuine consumers browse on their smartphones, they commute across a city and experience brief signal drops. These physical events force their hardware to re-authenticate with the network. The mobile carrier then assigns the device a brand-new IP address from the regional pool. Target platforms inherently expect this behavior. Consequently, an IP address changing within the bounds of a specific city or county is not an automatic red flag. What actually triggers anti-fraud systems is inconsistency in the digital footprint. As long as the regional origin and the device identity remain synchronized, the session remains valid. Modern automation relies entirely on consistent device and location profiles rather than rigid IP addresses. Choosing the right mobile proxies: Dedicated vs. Shared hardware When integrating cellular infrastructure into a pipeline, engineering teams must decide between two distinct types of mobile proxies. This choice directly impacts hardware control and session persistence. Dedicated proxies Dedicated mobile proxies provide an operator with exclusive, single-tenant access to a specific physical modem and SIM card. This grants unrestricted bandwidth and absolute programmatic control over the connection. Operators can trigger an IP change precisely when their workflow demands it via an API call integrated directly into their Python or Node.js scripts. Developers need to handle the rotation delay. When the API command executes, the physical modem drops its connection to the local cell tower and renegotiates a new one. This reset takes 5 to 10 seconds. Scripts require deliberate pauses (e.g., time.sleep(10)) during this window. Sending payloads before the modem re-authenticates causes timeout errors. Shared proxies Shared mobile proxies allow multiple independent users to route their traffic through the same physical 5G/LTE modem simultaneously. Because the connection is multiplexed, the IP address on a shared port rotates at a strict, automated interval typically every 5 or 30 minutes. Manual rotation is disabled because resetting the network would drop the connection for everyone sharing the hardware. Shared ports provide cost-effective CGNAT trust for stateless tasks. Shared networks provide excellent, cost-effective CGNAT trust for stateless tasks where session persistence is irrelevant. Handling deep packet inspection with VLESS While mobile proxy servers manage external routing, businesses sometimes face interference from their own local Internet Service Provider (ISP). Some local ISPs use Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) to monitor outbound traffic. Standard proxy protocols have recognizable cryptographic handshakes that DPI systems often restrict. To resolve this, premium mobile infrastructure supports the VLESS protocol. Rather than generating a custom proxy certificate, VLESS borrows the cryptographic signature of a highly trusted, unrelated domain during the TLS handshake. Local DPI tools analyze this outbound data flow and see standard HTTPS web browsing. This allows data teams to work without local network interruptions. Digital identity and environment setup High-trust IP addresses lose their value if a script logs into an account using a flagged VoIP phone number. The same happens if a localized payment uses a card that mismatches the proxy's geographic location. Operators pair dedicated mobile IP connections with clean browser profiles. They use tokenized payment cards matching the proxy's billing region and real residential phone numbers for SMS verifications. Sourcing these components from different providers slows down infrastructure deployment. Platforms like CyberYozh App consolidate these tools. Teams deploy dedicated mobile IPs, issue virtual cards, and rent local ISP numbers from a single ecosystem. Checking the complete setup through a built-in fraud scorer ensures a highly trusted profile before data extraction begins. Real-world application A market intelligence firm monitored retail pricing across European e-commerce platforms using data center proxies. Within days, the target platform recognized the commercial subnets, applied rate limits, and served manipulated HTML. The firm restructured its pipeline. They replaced their data center nodes with CyberYozh dedicated mobile proxies physically located in the target countries. Because the requests originated from genuine 4G/5G mobile gateways shielded by CGNAT, the firewall perceived the traffic as authentic mobile shoppers. The Python script held a single mobile IP for a persistent session, extracting the localized pricing data. Once a geographic sweep was complete, the script fired an API rotation call, paused operations for 10 seconds while the physical modem reset its radio link to the local cell tower, and seamlessly resumed collection on the next batch of URLs. By aligning their geographic footprint and accounting for the physical realities of hardware rotation, the firm restored stable access to their target data. Final thoughts on mobile proxy infrastructure Basic data collection methods struggle against modern traffic analysis. Because international platforms look closely at connection behavior to protect their localized data, relying on commercial server networks often leads to unstable access. Authentic LTE and 5G cellular hardware solves this problem. Carrier-Grade NAT and API rotation align the traffic with natural network behavior. This approach secures high IP quality and enables reliable data extraction at scale. As businesses rely more on location-specific data, the technology behind reliable web access is becoming an important part of modern data collection. For more practical guides on emerging technology, online infrastructure, and digital tools, explore Kemotech.

Engineering teams building market intelligence pipelines frequently deal with rate limits and manipulated pricing data. Target platforms actively manage incoming traffic using security tools like Web Application Firewalls...

Read more

Navi Eyes $40 Mn Funding as IPO Plans Take Shape

by Ishaan Negi
October 8, 2026
0
Sachin Bansal Steps Down as CEO, Takes on Executive Chairman Role at Navi

Navi, the financial services company led by Flipkart co-founder Sachin Bansal, is looking to raise around $40 million from Elevation Holdings as it strengthens its finances ahead of...

Read more

Ola Electric Eyes ₹1,000 Cr Rights Issue at 26% Discount

by Ishaan Negi
October 8, 2026
0
Ola Electric Eyes ₹1,000 Cr Rights Issue at 26% Discount

Ola Electric is looking to raise ₹1,000 crore through a rights issue, offering new shares at ₹27 apiece as the electric vehicle maker seeks fresh funds to strengthen...

Read more
Next Post
New York Times vs OpenAI: Unsealed Filing Reveals Scale of AI Content Collection

New York Times vs OpenAI: Unsealed Filing Reveals Scale of AI Content Collection

Please login to join discussion

Techstory

Tech and Business News from around the world. Follow along for latest in the world of Tech, AI, Crypto, EVs, Business Personalities and more.
reach us at info@techstory.in

Advertise With Us

Reach out at - info@techstory.in

Aviator Game India 2026

BROWSE BY TAG

#Crypto #howto 2024 acquisition AI amazon Apple Artificial Intelligence bitcoin Business China cryptocurrency e-commerce electric vehicles Elon Musk Ethereum facebook funding Gaming Google India Instagram Investment iPhone IPO Market Markets Meta Microsoft News OpenAI samsung Social Media SpaceX startup startups tech Tech news technology Tesla TikTok trend trending twitter US

© 2025 Techstory.in

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Crypto
  • Gadgets
  • Memes
  • Gaming
  • Cars
  • AI
  • Startups
  • Markets
  • How to

© 2025 Techstory.in

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?