Burry’s Scion Asset Management said in an administrative documenting in mid-May it had put choices on 800,100 Tesla shares as of the finish of the principal quarter. Subtleties on the strike cost of the puts, they’re worth, and regardless of whether they were important for a more extensive exchange were not accessible.
In light of Tesla’s end cost of $667.93 toward the finish of the principal quarter, the worth of that many offers would have been about $534 million. The real worth of the position of the choice was not known.
Put choices give financial backers the option to sell shares at a specific cost later on.
Choices examiners said around then it was conceivable the puts unveiled in the recording may be essential for a bigger exchange that would check misfortunes if the put position conflicted with the asset.
“No, it was an exchange,” Burry was cited as saying in an email to CNBC on Friday when found out if he was all the while shorting Tesla.
“Media truly swelled the worth of these things. I was never short tens or a huge number of any of these things through choices, as was accounted for. The choices wagers were amazingly awry, and the media was off by significant degrees,” Burry told CNBC.
One of the financial backers profiled in the book “The Big Short” and the film of a similar name for wagering more than $1 billion against the U.S. lodging bubble, Burry has recently been wary of Tesla’s high as can be valuations.
Tesla and Scion Asset Management didn’t promptly react to this. Offers in Tesla rose barely after the ringer on Friday.