The Supreme Court of Venezuela has levied a $10 million penalty on the social media application TikTok. The Supreme Court had found the company responsible for failing to put safeguards to prevent dangerous viral challenges that it claimed were responsible for killing three Venezuelan children in the last few months.
The decision by Judge Tania D’Amelio states that TikTok was negligent and it needs to establish a local office in Venezuela, monitoring content against national laws. The court gave it eight days to pay the fine, though it remains unclear how Venezuela would collect the fine from the parent company in China.
The lawsuit follows a string of tragic incidents involving young Venezuelans who participated in challenges that went viral on the social media app. President Nicolas Maduro, in November, implicated TikTok in the death of a 12-year-old Venezuelan girl who allegedly died from taking part in a challenge where a challenge participant consumes tranquilizer pills while trying to stay awake.Â
TikTok Under Fire in Venezuela Amidst Child Deaths
Another death was reported by Education Minister Hector Rodriguez, who attributed his 14-year-old victim’s death to the outcome of inhaling substances as part of a TikTok challenge. Venezuela’s attorney general, on November 21, concluded that a third child died from other challenges on the platform. To date, TikTok has not responded to the allegations or the ruling.
This decision is in line with Venezuela’s stringent restrictions on the regulation of social media and control of content. This move against TikTok is part of the overall media restrictions conducted in Venezuela under the rule of Maduro. Previously, the government blocked several dozen websites because they did not comply with the country’s telecommunications regulations.Â
The VE Sin Filtro group monitors media freedom. It reports that so far this year alone, more than 60 websites belonging to human rights organizations and news agencies have been temporarily blocked or banned. Several radio stations and television channels have also been shut off because of their news coverage.
Can Nations Rein in Tech Giants?
This was further brought out by the government when it temporarily banned X (formerly Twitter) in August. The owner of the platform, Elon Musk, had accused Maduro of having committed election fraud, as supported by the observations from both the United Nations and the Carter Center, which stated that the election on July 28 did not meet the international standard. While X is accessible on private internet service providers, it remains blocked on Movilnet, the state-owned internet provider.
This new move against TikTok brings up fresh questions of whether international social media regulation can stem the tide of tech giants’ disregard for borders and the problems of trying to enforce national court judgments against global players. It also reflects the growing tension between government control and social media influence, especially with regards to youth safety and political expression in Venezuela.
This case shows the tension between protecting young users from harmful online trends and maintaining open digital communications in an increasingly connected world. As social media continues to define youth culture and behavior, governments continue to wrestle with tech companies over issues of content moderation and user safety.
