Elon Musk
Credits: AajTak

Govt should consider bringing in age limit for use of social media: HC

The High Court of Karnataka has posed a provocative question that has the potential to change how we interact with these digital platforms in a world where social media is a pervasive influence. The court put forth a ground-breaking suggestion during the hearing of an appeal by X Corp (previously Twitter) against removal orders issued by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeiTY): setting a social media age limit comparable to the legal drinking age. This idea doesn’t just cause discussion; it also sparks a heated argument about how to strike the right balance between the freedom of expression and the significant responsibility that comes with it in the digital era.

The court had also imposed a cost of Rs 50 lakh on X Corp.

Credits: Money Control

The Case at Hand

The legal dispute between X Corp and MeiTY centers on the deletion of online information, but it has much wider implications for how social media is used in our lives and is regulated, particularly with regard to children.

The Call for Age Limit on Social Media

The High Court’s audacious proposal of an age limit for social media usage is nothing short of revolutionary, setting forth a sea of questions and considerations that touch upon our digital rights, freedom, and the welfare of our younger generations.

Addressing Addiction: In a world where “scrolling” has become synonymous with breathing for today’s youth, the court’s concern over the addictive nature of social media is palpable. The question arises: is an age limit the antidote to curb this incessant digital craving?

Maturity and Responsibility: The court’s doubt about the ability of individuals aged 17 or 18 to judge what’s in the best interest of the nation is a pressing one. It reminds us that freedom should be coupled with a profound sense of responsibility in the online realm.

Corruption of Mind: The court’s concern over the potential corruption of young minds through exposure to online content opens a Pandora’s box of debates around content control and the need for more stringent regulations in the digital space.

The Companies Involved: X Corp (formerly Twitter)

Legal disputes and conflicts are nothing new for X Corp, formerly known as Twitter. This social media behemoth, which connects millions of people globally, is frequently at the center of debates about content moderation and regulatory compliance. In this case, X Corp contested MeiTY’s ruling on the grounds that users weren’t informed about the deletion of their accounts and tweets and that the firm was effectively forbidden from informing them.

Possible Impact of the Move

Protecting Minors: The proposed age limit could offer a shield against potentially harmful online content and set the stage for healthier digital lifestyles among young users.

Content Moderation: With a more mature user base, social media platforms may find content moderation more manageable. Nevertheless, this begs the question of who decides what’s appropriate and whether different age groups should have different rules.

Freedom of Expression: Critics argue that imposing an age limit might tread on the freedom of expression for young individuals. Striking the right balance between safeguarding minors and permitting them to participate in public discourse remains a formidable challenge.

Legal and Technical Challenges: Implementing an age limit is no walk in the digital park. Age verification is tricky, and there are significant technical hurdles to ensure underage users don’t slip through the cracks.

Government Responsibility: The court’s suggestion spotlights the government’s role in regulating digital spaces. It calls for a review of rules and responsibilities, especially concerning content removal and government orders.


We are faced with a digital conundrum as a result of the High Court of Karnataka’s audacious suggestion of an age restriction for social media. The tempting idea of rethinking our relationship with these platforms and reevaluating the precarious balance between freedom and accountability is raised as the case develops.

The argument over a social media age restriction encourages us to reflect on the fundamental principles that guide our online lives as we navigate this digital frontier. It forces us to consider how to balance our freedom of expression with our need to safeguard the minds of the next generation.