Reports suggest that a lawsuit accusing Tesla Inc of promoting a workplace of unchecked sexual harassment would continue in court. This was following a California judge denying the EV company’s motion of arbitration. The female employee who brought up this particular case had signed an arbitration agreement at the company, letting go off her rights to sue. Despite this, Stephen Klaus, an Alameda County Superior Court Judge went on to move forward with the decision on Monday, May 23.
Court documents show how the Judge stated that Barraza was ‘ambushed’ by the arbitration policies of the company. This was as the EV company did not indicate that she would be compelled to ‘agree arbitrate employment claims,’ giving up her right to a fair jury trial. In March, President signed a bill that suspends forced arbitration in cases of sexual harassment. However, it doesn’t apply to this case as it began prior to the bill becoming law.
Barraza’s lawyer David Lowe gave in a statement saying that this is a clear ‘victory for public accountability.’ He stated how owing to his ruling, Tesla Inc would no longer be able to ‘hide behind closed doors of confidential arbitration.’ He added that instead, now the company would be judged by a jury consisting of the victim’s peers in a public courtroom.
Moreover, this comes along as the CEO himself faces allegations of sexual harassment which came forward in reports from last week. Musk had allegedly exposed during a flight to London on his private jet to a female flight attendance. She alleges that Musk had inappropriately rubbed his leg and asked for an erotic massage by offering to buy her a horse. Reportedly, SpaceX paid her $250,000 to settle the case outside of court.
Both Musk and his team have strong denied the allegations with the President of SpaceX calling them ‘false.’ This has led to the billionaire CEO losing about $10 billion of his net worth, and pointed out the accusations were brought up to interfere with his Twitter deal which he had placed on temporary hold.